- Home
- Games
- Company
- Community
- Roadmap
- Media
- Store
- Store Support
- Feedback
- Contact Us
- Warhammer 40K
- Home
- Community
- Hub
- Heavy Flamers and Cover
Heavy Flamers and Cover
Warhammer 40K FeedbackWas reading earlier about your thoughts on covers and i wanted to join in with my 2 cents.
How about when you fire on a cover with a Heavy flamer, the cover takes the brunt of the damage, while it continues to do damage behind it, but at 50% (degree to be determined later) effectiveness? That way the player have to chosse to move around the cover to deal full damage or fire through it and still maintain some effectivenss.
I reckon this can also apply to some other weapons, thinking mostly of the meltagun-family and their channeled attacks.
Your Thoughts? Please login to place your opinion. Not a member yet? Register here and now!
Well. Look at it like this. You're in cover and nowhere to go. Flames left and right. Slowly melting your cover. Knowing you'll get burned to a crisp.
Yeah good idea.
But how about flamers deal double damage to cover and radiate suppresion damage. Wich makes more sense.
Because the flames cant pass through solid cover.
Set this current order state as My default.